On Fri, 30 Jul 2004 11:50:57 -0400 (EDT), Ken Manheimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>   Accepted: Issues that some supporter(s) has responsibility for resolving
>             it, and it is not yet resolved.
>             Your description says that some supporter has assessed the
>             issue as warranting repair, and later says that the the issue
>             has an assigned supporter.  I think it's a lot clearer to
>             directly say that an accepted issue has a supporter
>             responsible for resolving it.

I don't think it makes sense to use this to indicate a supporter (and
possibly some of their time) has been allocated to deal with the
issue; the list of assigned supporters should be sufficient for that. 
If the list is empty, no supporter has been assigned.

I think "Accepted" should be used to indicate that the issue is real
and still needs to be addressed in some way.  This is independent of
assigning it to one or more specific supporters.


Fred L. Drake, Jr.    <fdrake at gmail.com>
Zope Corporation
Zope-Dev maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )

Reply via email to