[Tim Peters] >> Jim, while I personally don't care much, Zope3's repackaging of >> docutils doesn't meet license requirements to retain the original >> licenses in derivative works. Zope2's does, because it includes >> docutil's whole 'licenses' subdirectory (except for the GPL).
[Jim Fulton] > At least as of the time that I added docutils to Zope 3, it had no > licenses. Nevertheless, I include a mention of the docutils non-license > in: > > http://svn.zope.org/Zope3/trunk/LICENSES.txt?view=markup The current docutils package includes 4 licenses. You mention roman.py in the above, and docutils is in part a derivative of that, so Zope3 is too, and the Python 2.1.1 license roman.py was released under requires retaining the license in derivative works. Including a link to the license doesn't meet that requirement, although I strongly doubt roman.py's author would object. It's exciting to live dangerously <wink>. _______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )