SQLite implements enough of a subset of SQL to be genuinely useful and it's performance isn't too bad either. There is a Zope DA for it somewhere too.

We've never been able to use Gadfly for testing as it's so far from standard SQL that it just causes more problems than it solves - as we saw at the beginning of this thread.


A

On 10 Oct 2005, at 15:03, Sidnei da Silva wrote:

On Mon, Oct 10, 2005 at 08:58:53AM +0100, Chris Withers wrote:
| Andreas Jung wrote:
| >Argh...there is also a gadfly package coming from Zope 3. So when we
| >remove it from the Zope 2 core we get it back with Zope 3 :-)
|
| Well, having a lightweight semi-functional rdb engine in the distro has | always seemed handy for me, mainly for testing rdb-related components | with the certainty that the rdb engine you're testing with will always
| be there...
|
| Maybe we should move it to the testing package?

If I'm allowed to say anything, I would like to see gadfly being
replaced by sqlite. It's available mostly everywhere except in Windows
by default, as many products already use it. sqlite itself is 'public
domain' and the python da has the same license as zlib if i recall,
which is very permissive as well.

--
Sidnei da Silva
Enfold Systems, LLC.
http://enfoldsystems.com

--
Logicalware Ltd
Stuart House, Eskmills, Musselburgh, EH21 7PQ, UK
Tel: +44(0)131 273 5130 http://www.logicalware.com



--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.

_______________________________________________
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )

Reply via email to