On Wed, 2006-28-06 at 14:01 +0200, Andreas Jung wrote: > > --On 28. Juni 2006 13:56:58 +0200 Florent Guillaume <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Has this change been discussed? > > I don't agree with it. Unicode strings aren't byte strings. File and > > Image should only work with byte strings. > > Code dealing with them should always know and assume that they use str. > > Anything using unicode with them is broken or has done insufficient > > input validation. > > I agree. This checkin must be reverted. In fact one raise a ValueError in > case the data is a unicode string.
Alrighty, reverting change. Sorry about the confusion. The more I think about this the more I agree. I'll still change the logic to do isinstance(data, str) rather than type('') == type(data) and I'll also add the explicit check for unicode and raise a ValueError if found, does this all sound ok? - Rocky -- Rocky Burt ServerZen Software -- http://www.serverzen.com News About The Server (blog) -- http://www.serverzen.net
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )