On Wednesday 07 November 2007, Christian Theune wrote:
> A name proposal would be "Zope 3 Common Criteria Edition". The question
> would be whether to let it have it's own version number (1.0) or to
> start from the version number of Zope 3.3 that it was built on.
I think it would be okay to start at 1.0; It is a important accomplishment and
would confuse people less, I think.
My question would be, with Zope being split into packages now, would it not be
easier to do the security evaluation based on a set of eggs? It would entail
less code that needs to be reviewed.
CBU Physics & Chemistry (B.S.) / Tufts Physics (Ph.D. student)
Web2k - Web Software Design, Development and Training
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -