On Wednesday 07 November 2007, Christian Theune wrote:
> A name proposal would be "Zope 3 Common Criteria Edition". The question
> would be whether to let it have it's own version number (1.0) or to
> start from the version number of Zope 3.3 that it was built on.

I think it would be okay to start at 1.0; It is a important accomplishment and 
would confuse people less, I think.

My question would be, with Zope being split into packages now, would it not be 
easier to do the security evaluation based on a set of eggs? It would entail 
less code that needs to be reviewed.

Stephan Richter
CBU Physics & Chemistry (B.S.) / Tufts Physics (Ph.D. student)
Web2k - Web Software Design, Development and Training
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )

Reply via email to