See the discussion on plone-dev a while ago, "link integrity checking
will make Plone 3.0 broken and dangerous". Worth trying with 2.9.8 at least.
Laurence
--On 18. August 2007 21:03:43 +0200 Andreas Jung
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> --On 23. Juli 2007 08:53:32 +0200 Wichert Akkerman
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
>> Previously Andreas Jung wrote:
>>> Having SecureMailhost as a replacement for MailHost would have been a
>>> nice addition to the Zope core..but you choose to go with your own
>>> implementation :->
>>
>> If possible I want to try and move Plone 3.5 to zope.sendmail, which
>> seems to be much cleaner than all the
>> MailHost/SecureMailHost/DropMailHost/etc. products combined.
>>
>>
>
> There is now TransactionalMailHost (on top of zope.sendmail)
>
> <http://svn.zope.org/Products.TransactionalMailHost/>
>
> providing transaction-aware Mailhost support + support for TLS/SSL
> (like in SecureMailHost - however it requires yet an unofficial
> zope.sendmail branch). I think this should make most Mailhost
> excrescences
> obsolete. If there is some functionalty missing I would be happy to
add it
> (if it makes sense).
>
In addition the same functionality + asynchronous mail delivery (similar
to Maildrophost but without having an external process) will be
available as part of the standard Zope MailHost implementation in Zope 2.11.
Andreas
_______________________________________________
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
