--On 10. Juli 2008 17:09:36 +0200 Brian Sutherland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 12:12:06AM -0400, Paul Winkler wrote:Hi,
I havn't investigated properly, but it may be necessary to do the isDoomed() check at a higher level where you can abort.
What do you mean by "higher level"? I think that the check within the ZPublisher is the highest and right place.
Code running after the commit() expects a new transaction and now will not get that.
You refer to code executed as part of a ZODB post-commit handler?If a transaction is doomed then such handlers should never be executed - right?
Andreas
pgpKkDXi6hGoS.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
