On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 05:32:33PM +0000, Chris Withers wrote: > Martijn Faassen wrote: > >>> This makes a lot more sense to me than having the ZCML support in > >>> either zope.component or zope.security. > >> Indeed, surely all zcml stuff belongs in zope.configuration anyway? > > > > No, not there either, as zope.configuration doesn't define *any* > > directives except the basic ones like 'include' and 'configure'. If you > > would implement zope 3's directives in zope.configuration it'd start > > pulling in dependencies like crazies, creating more dependency cycles. > > > > I think a new package might be in order. > > Indeed, maybe: > > zope.configuration.x > zope.configuration.y
Please don't, having namespace packages that contain files (as zope.configuration already does) breaks setuptools. > etc... > > cheers, > > Chris > > -- > Simplistix - Content Management, Zope & Python Consulting > - http://www.simplistix.co.uk > _______________________________________________ > Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org > http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev > ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** > (Related lists - > http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce > http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope ) -- Brian Sutherland _______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
