On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 05:32:33PM +0000, Chris Withers wrote:
> Martijn Faassen wrote:
> >>> This makes a lot more sense to me than having the ZCML support in
> >>> either zope.component or zope.security.
> >> Indeed, surely all zcml stuff belongs in zope.configuration anyway?
> > 
> > No, not there either, as zope.configuration doesn't define *any* 
> > directives except the basic ones like 'include' and 'configure'. If you 
> > would implement zope 3's directives in zope.configuration it'd start 
> > pulling in dependencies like crazies, creating more dependency cycles.
> > 
> > I think a new package might be in order.
> 
> Indeed, maybe:
> 
> zope.configuration.x
> zope.configuration.y

Please don't, having namespace packages that contain files (as
zope.configuration already does) breaks setuptools.

> etc...
> 
> cheers,
> 
> Chris
> 
> -- 
> Simplistix - Content Management, Zope & Python Consulting
>             - http://www.simplistix.co.uk
> _______________________________________________
> Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
> http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
> **  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
> (Related lists - 
>  http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
>  http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )

-- 
Brian Sutherland
_______________________________________________
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )

Reply via email to