Baiju M wrote: > On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 2:35 PM, Dan Korostelev <nad...@gmail.com> wrote: >> 2009/3/2 Tres Seaver <tsea...@palladion.com>: >>>>> -<include package="zope.file"/> >>>> I believe people still use the ZCML "slug" files like the above. >>> They certainly aren't related to 'zpkg'. The intent of the slugs was to >>> allow for something like 'sites-available' / 'sites-enabled' (the >>> pattern in a stock Debian Apache2 install). >>> >>> I think it is particularly unfortunate to remove support for explicit, >>> granular configuration at the same time as folks seem to be jumping to >>> implicit (aka "majyk") tools. >>> >>> Please revert this part of the change. >> I just reverted the change, however, I don't think that the "slug" >> files are useful anymore. > > I cannot see similar slugs in other packages either.
Agreed. I don't understand Tres's or Benji's point either; thanks to buildout we've left such slugs long behind us I thought. Typically people would symlink these into an old old installation of Zope 3 (or copy them over). Explicit granular configuration isn't broken at all; if you want to explicitly include zope.file, you include its configure.zcml, not its "zope.file-configure.zcml". Unless Tres comes back with some convincing explanation soon, please do get rid of this stuff. Regards, Martijn _______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )