On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 19:55, Dieter Maurer <die...@handshake.de> wrote: > The parameter was pointless in the first place. > One and only one value for it worked -- the one that could be > determined automatically.
Which is why it was removed. :) (and also, I think there was a use case where the one calling the parameter *didn't* know the value. Five I think. Ah well) > Thus, it was good to get rid of it -- just the deprecation warning > was silly: instead, a value different from the only correct one should > have resulted in an exception. True. -- Lennart Regebro: Pythonista, Barista, Notsotrista. http://regebro.wordpress.com/ +33 661 58 14 64 _______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
