On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 19:55, Dieter Maurer <die...@handshake.de> wrote:
> The parameter was pointless in the first place.
> One and only one value for it worked -- the one that could be
> determined automatically.

Which is why it was removed. :) (and also, I think there was a use
case where the one calling the parameter *didn't* know the value. Five
I think. Ah well)

> Thus, it was good to get rid of it -- just the deprecation warning
> was silly: instead, a value different from the only correct one should
> have resulted in an exception.


Lennart Regebro: Pythonista, Barista, Notsotrista.
+33 661 58 14 64
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )

Reply via email to