On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 19:55, Dieter Maurer <die...@handshake.de> wrote:
> The parameter was pointless in the first place.
> One and only one value for it worked -- the one that could be
> determined automatically.
Which is why it was removed. :) (and also, I think there was a use
case where the one calling the parameter *didn't* know the value. Five
I think. Ah well)
> Thus, it was good to get rid of it -- just the deprecation warning
> was silly: instead, a value different from the only correct one should
> have resulted in an exception.
Lennart Regebro: Pythonista, Barista, Notsotrista.
+33 661 58 14 64
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -