On Wed, 15 Apr 2009 09:37:33 +0200
Martijn Faassen <faas...@startifact.com> wrote:

> Perhaps one way to make the ZMI and optional package is to aggregate the 
> relevant ZMI code into a smaller amount of packages (or a single 
> package), for instance zmi.core. The benefit of doing that is that it 
> should be possible to evolve the code slowly. You could still support 
> the zope.app.* packages compatibility by putting imports from 
> zope.app.something.browser to zmi.core.

Then I'll take this way for now. Maybe z3c.zmi.core would be good?

Best regards,
Yusei TAHARA <yu...@domen.cx>
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )

Reply via email to