On Wed, 15 Apr 2009 09:37:33 +0200
Martijn Faassen <faas...@startifact.com> wrote:
> Perhaps one way to make the ZMI and optional package is to aggregate the
> relevant ZMI code into a smaller amount of packages (or a single
> package), for instance zmi.core. The benefit of doing that is that it
> should be possible to evolve the code slowly. You could still support
> the zope.app.* packages compatibility by putting imports from
> zope.app.something.browser to zmi.core.
Then I'll take this way for now. Maybe z3c.zmi.core would be good?
Yusei TAHARA <yu...@domen.cx>
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -