Hi, On Wed, 15 Apr 2009 09:37:33 +0200 Martijn Faassen <faas...@startifact.com> wrote:
> Perhaps one way to make the ZMI and optional package is to aggregate the > relevant ZMI code into a smaller amount of packages (or a single > package), for instance zmi.core. The benefit of doing that is that it > should be possible to evolve the code slowly. You could still support > the zope.app.* packages compatibility by putting imports from > zope.app.something.browser to zmi.core. Then I'll take this way for now. Maybe z3c.zmi.core would be good? Best regards, -- Yusei TAHARA <yu...@domen.cx> _______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
