Am Tue, 05 May 2009 15:45:31 +0200 schrieb Martijn Faassen: [...] > As I pointed out, it is effectively inaccessible for Plone users anyway, > as Zope 3 is already installed. You *cannot* mix Zope Toolkit and Zope 3 > libraries just like that and expect anything to work.
I dont expect them to work. I try an test. And if it works, why not? Its not that painful. [...] > I don't believe in this Plone (for *existing Plone releases*) user base > anyway, so I don't think it's getting smaller. Oh, I dont believe in much, but I know a good bunch of active developers and interators using Plone this way. > If we'd have released a Zope 3.5 that didn't have Python 2.4 support, > would you have complained that you cannot use Zope 3.5 with an existing > Plone release? If I'd have read the dicussion at the right time: yes. > This is the same as trying to use Zope 3.4 and Zope 3.3 components > together (though the changes from Zope 3.4 to the Toolkit are *bigger* > as we move things around). It *might* just work in some cases, but it's > unlikely it will. Using Zope 3.4 within Zope 3.3 (like Zope 2.10) works almost fine. > I will note that Grok 1.0 won't work with the Zope Toolkit either; we're > sticking with Zope 3.4. Only after 1.0 will we go over to the toolkit. Well, Grok is not as complex as Plone is. Also it has a smaller user-base. > It is, but again, it's just wishful thinking that the toolkit libraries > as they are released today will work in combination with a existing > release of Plone. As a whole: No. Little parts: Yes. And yes, I wish it would be much simpler to use ZTK-bits in Plone. regards Jens -- Jens W. Klein - Klein & Partner KEG - BlueDynamics Alliance _______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - [email protected] http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
