Roger Ineichen wrote: >>>> 5. writing makers >>>> ----------------- >>>> >>>> Proposal: Pass in the additional arguments and fall back >> to the old >>>> signature for BBB. >> Done. I also added site_zcml as argument. >> >> What about wrapping py_strings, zcml_strings and tal_strings >> in functions that implement the new interface? This would >> make it possible to add them to the makers list and call them >> in the same loop. > > Yes, why not. Probably we should do this together with a > refactoring and change/enhance the method signature for > the pot makers.
I'm not sure I understand what you mean. What exactly do you want to change/enhance? This checkin already changed/enhanced the way pot makers are called: http://svn.zope.org/?rev=101958&view=rev Do you want to improve that further or do you propose to modify py_strings, zcml_strings and tal_strings? They all have currently different signatures. I can't see a way to unify that in a backwards compatible way. That's why I proposed to wrap them in new z3c.recipe.i18n specific functions. I propose I start with the changes I have in mind. Of course you can improve that further after I'm done. Cheers, Yuppie _______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
