Roger Ineichen wrote:
>>>> 5. writing makers
>>>> Proposal: Pass in the additional arguments and fall back
>> to the old
>>>> signature for BBB.
>> Done. I also added site_zcml as argument.
>> What about wrapping py_strings, zcml_strings and tal_strings
>> in functions that implement the new interface? This would
>> make it possible to add them to the makers list and call them
>> in the same loop.
> Yes, why not. Probably we should do this together with a
> refactoring and change/enhance the method signature for
> the pot makers.
I'm not sure I understand what you mean. What exactly do you want to
This checkin already changed/enhanced the way pot makers are called:
Do you want to improve that further or do you propose to modify
py_strings, zcml_strings and tal_strings? They all have currently
different signatures. I can't see a way to unify that in a backwards
compatible way. That's why I proposed to wrap them in new
z3c.recipe.i18n specific functions.
I propose I start with the changes I have in mind. Of course you can
improve that further after I'm done.
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -