Dan Korostelev wrote: > 2009/8/24 Stephan Richter <srich...@cosmos.phy.tufts.edu>: >> On Friday 21 August 2009, Dan Korostelev wrote: >>> BrowserSkinsVocabulary - this can be moved to zope.publisher.browser >>> and rewritten with zope.schema's SimpleVocabulary not to introduce >>> dependency on zope.componentvocabulary. >> -1. Why? The reason we wrote the zope.componentvocabulary code originally was >> exactly to avoid the constant reimplementation of that code. > > Well, the only reason is that zope.publisher currently doesn't depend > on zope.componentvocabulary. But it doesn't matter for me personally, > so if steering group decides that it's okay to add a dependency on > zope.componentvocabulary to zope.publisher, I won't rewrite the > vocabulary with SimpleVocabulary :-)
For the reasons of code stability let's rely on zope.componentvocabulary then, at least for now. zope.componentvocabulary doesn't look like it adds serious dependencies. Regards, Martijn _______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
