Thomas Lotze wrote:
> I just noticed that depends on, both via
> configure.zcml and the tests. The dependency isn't currently declared.
> On the other hand, doesn't yet depend on
> I'd like to get rid of the dependency of on
> and I think it would be OK to invert it by moving the relevant ZCML
> declarations (two event handler registrations) and the two pieces of test
> regarding traversal behaviour to, which would thereby
> grow a new dependency on What do others think?

At first glance I'm +1 on doing this. We'll need analyze what we can do 
with too.



Zope-Dev maillist  -
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - )

Reply via email to