On Nov 25, 2009, at 11:54 AM, Chris McDonough wrote:

> Gary Poster wrote:
>> FWIW, I'm saying that utilities and adapters are different.  I share 
>> your/Martijn's/other people's general thoughts about merging adapters and 
>> multiadapters in the interface __call__ syntax.
> There might should be more obvious APIs for just *retrieving* an adapter 
> based on a set of interfaces; it's useful to be able to retrieve an adapter 
> without invoking it.  Currently this is possible via 
> registry.adapters.loookup, which is fine.
> And I know it's heresy, but sometimes I register something as an "adapter" 
> that is not callable with the number of arguments I'm adapting it with.  
> Sometimes its convenient to register something that gets adapted using a 
> number of arguments that doesn't match the adaptation arguments.
> If some set of ZCA APIs made it the responsibility of the *caller* to invoke 
> the adapter with arguments would go a long way between normalizing the 
> difference between utilities and adapters (because they would essentially 
> then be the same thing).

Yeah, this is one of my goals too.


Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )

Reply via email to