-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Martijn Faassen wrote:
> Are people okay with the proposed semantics? +1. > Would people be okay with such an upgrade path? Any better ideas? I would start issuign DeprecationWarnings (yes, I know I'm their worst fan, but we can't keep BBB here, so warnings are appropriate) for positional defaults in 3.9.x. I think we should also document the "don't call" API better (pure lookup): there have been use cases for this feature (e.g., "adapt to scalar / string") floating around for a *long* time now, unsupported. If that means accepting the zope.registry change Chris proposed, I'm fine with that. > Most importantly, any volunteers? I can help some with this. Perhaps we should start by fleshing it *really good docs* (not doctests) for zope.component 4.0, including careful notes about how to make existing code compatible with both 3.x and 4.x APIs. Tres. - -- =================================================================== Tres Seaver +1 540-429-0999 tsea...@palladion.com Palladion Software "Excellence by Design" http://palladion.com -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAksQLNoACgkQ+gerLs4ltQ7+DwCg1ZklISCMQ66rOa7JPDoH2KwU 8GcAoK0o14wk00CAXu+yNsEbP//NTy2z =78/b -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
