Am 27.11.2009, 15:57 Uhr, schrieb Chris Withers <ch...@simplistix.co.uk>:
> Well, I don't think the difference between adapters and utilities is
> important, but I can understand why some people find calling the
> interface odd: it is when you think about it objectively.
I have to agree with this. IFoo(myobject) is not intuitive. I know it used
a lot because it's convenient shorthand but I've never read anywhere that
interface classes are, in fact, callables. We certainly don't normally
treat them as such.
One of the things that I have grown to appreciate with the ZCA is the
advantage of spelling out the relationship between objects and I'll
happily take a little verbosity over magic.
The discussion does highlight a key source of confusion about Zope
interfaces: they are, at the same time, an object specification and a kind
of name tag or token that objects can provide upon request. While I know
that the second function is derived from the first it is conceptually
My preference, for the sake of clarity:
adapted = an_easy_way_to_the_registry.adapt(*objects_to_be_adapted,
That adapters are all callable now seems to be an accepted convention,
presumably from convenience. But my understanding of adapters does not
Clark Consulting & Research
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -