Tres Seaver wrote:
> Do we really have a significant codebase which both needs to adapt
> tuples *and* uses the interface-calling sugar?
I hope not. That's why I walk all over it breaking backwards
compatibility in this plan.
We'd need to live with IFoo((a, b)) for a few years as opposed to
IFoo(a, b), but if that means we can move forward without breaking a lot
of code, I think we should take that hit. Maybe we'll like it enough
that we never really need IFoo(a, b) after all.
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -