-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> On 2010-2-8 22:38, Tres Seaver wrote:
>> In the mean time, you could patch the file in via your debian/ control
>> stuff, I guess. The Ubuntu / Debian interpretation of "legality of
>> distribution" is not controlling outside their universes, I think.
> It is since they require that the 'pristine upstream source' they ship
> is legally valid. And they do have a point that our packages explicitly
> point to an internal license file in the package which does not exist.
My point is that their interpretation is valid in terms of blocking
acceptance into their distros: whether it is valid for anybody else is
more open to debate. I don't see this as a "big red button" emergency,
myself, and think that fixing the issue upstream as part of the ZF
assignment fixup should be fine.
Tres Seaver +1 540-429-0999 tsea...@palladion.com
Palladion Software "Excellence by Design" http://palladion.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -