-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Christian Theune wrote: > On 03/04/2010 04:13 PM, Jim Fulton wrote: >> On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 2:42 AM, Fabio Tranchitella <kob...@kobold.it> wrote: >>> * 2010-03-03 21:44, Jim Fulton wrote: >>>> The ZTK was created in part to deal with instability issues arising from >>>> people working on parts without testing the whole. >>> I suppose everybody here agrees that any change to a package which is part >>> of the ZTK *must* be tested against the whole ZTK. >> It would be great if that were true. > > That's been my understanding all the time. I think we currently don't do > it because it might be non-obvious to the individual developers at the > time of check-in and due to underused tools. > > We may not require that a single developer run all test suites in all > combinations we desire to be compatible, but with the ongoing effort to > improve the nightly/automated builds we should get into better shape there. > > The one issue with delayed testing is that we would have to impose a > rule which requires "cool down" time after a checkin before making a > release. That's probably not a terrible thing anyway.
I would think that requiring the buildbots to clear before tagging a new release of the ztk.cfg file is a good "cool down", but we can't require that people not release the included packages: the ZTK isn't really testable without having them released (a chicken-and-egg problem). I would say that updating ztk.cfg to new "major" versions of sub-packages (ones with new features, or potential backward compatibility issues) requires a great deal more care than updating it to use a new "bugfix only" release of a package already in the ZTK. Adding or removing packages from the ZTK should probably also be a "branch only" item, with discussion required here before merging. Tres. - -- =================================================================== Tres Seaver +1 540-429-0999 tsea...@palladion.com Palladion Software "Excellence by Design" http://palladion.com -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkuRVaYACgkQ+gerLs4ltQ5J3gCg0tFeV6g1lxDk9NdxKk9Ze1Is ceIAoIJjcsL/Ya7Ei4H5lBxqE+sdGDsh =epLA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
