On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 10:53 AM, Baiju M <mba...@zeomega.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>   Any idea how difficult it is to create optional C extensions
> for these packages:
> zope.container
> zope.hookable
> zope.proxy
> zope.security

I believe it is very hard, if not impossible, for zope.proxy and
zope.security.  I suspect the best approach would be to make a new
package (or set of packages) that provides everything that
zope.security providex except the zope.security.proxy package.  If I
were going to do that though, I would rethink the way proxies and
checkers are managed.


Jim Fulton
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )

Reply via email to