On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 6:15 PM, Tim Hoffman <zutes...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi
> As Attila pointed out, zope.proxy is possible to implement using
> peak.util.proxies
> if you only want some limited zope.proxy support.  You won't get
> zope.security going down
> this path.
> I do that specifically so that I can use zope.deferredimport on app engine.
> Below is the awful hacking I do to zope.proxy.__init__ to make it
> support zope.deferredimport on appengine.

Please don't encourage this.

People reading this, please forget you read Tim's email. :)
(Jim whips out special pen and asks that everyone look in his
direction for a moement.)

zope.deferred import should, perhaps, be modified to use
peak.util.proxies, but we should not have packages floating around
that modify zope.proxy to weaken it.

I wish I had agitated to make changes to Python to make deferred
imports use of zope.proxy unnecessary.


Jim Fulton
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )

Reply via email to