On Thursday 08 April 2010, Martin Aspeli wrote: > Yes, I did look at it. However, the real goal is to provide isolation > for "anything" that makes ZCA registrations. In particular, that > includes provideAdapter() and friends. I suspect z3c.baseregistry can't > deal with this?
I think it can be done, just not in the way I intended it to. Instead of adding the base registry to bases, you have to make it the actual registry for the API, which should be no problem from a functional test setup function. Regards, Stephan -- Entrepreneur and Software Geek Google me. "Zope Stephan Richter" _______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )