On Thursday 08 April 2010, Martin Aspeli wrote:
> Yes, I did look at it. However, the real goal is to provide isolation 
> for "anything" that makes ZCA registrations. In particular, that 
> includes provideAdapter() and friends. I suspect z3c.baseregistry can't 
> deal with this?

I think it can be done, just not in the way I intended it to. Instead of 
adding the base registry to bases, you have to make it the actual registry for 
the API, which should be no problem from a functional test setup function.

Entrepreneur and Software Geek
Google me. "Zope Stephan Richter"
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )

Reply via email to