On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 10:01:35AM -0400, Tres Seaver wrote: > Hanno Schlichting wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 3:23 PM, Charlie Clark > > <charlie.cl...@clark-consulting.eu> wrote: > >> what's the time frame for ZTK 1.0? > > > > I put that info into the "post scriptum" of my mail. > > > >> Have I missed a mail with more failures? I would have thought getting > >> those tests to pass for a release is a reasonable aim. > > > > You have. It's only "bin/test-ztk" that passes. bin/test-zopeapp still > > has a number of failures. > > There is also the zope.testing failure where a doctest tries to drive > the pdb module: 2.7 added a new intermediate (private) method to the > call stack in unittest's 'assertEqual', which causes that test to fail.
That shouldn't be too difficult to fix; zope.testing already uses quite a few regexp-based renormalizers to hide traceback elements that differ in different Python versions. (Debugging those is a pain, though.) Marius Gedminas -- http://pov.lt/ -- Zope 3 consulting and development
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )