On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 10:01:35AM -0400, Tres Seaver wrote:
> Hanno Schlichting wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 3:23 PM, Charlie Clark
> > <charlie.cl...@clark-consulting.eu> wrote:
> >> what's the time frame for ZTK 1.0?
> > 
> > I put that info into the "post scriptum" of my mail.
> > 
> >> Have I missed a mail with more failures? I would have thought getting
> >> those tests to pass for a release is a reasonable aim.
> > 
> > You have. It's only "bin/test-ztk" that passes. bin/test-zopeapp still
> > has a number of failures.
> 
> There is also the zope.testing failure where a doctest tries to drive
> the pdb module:  2.7 added a new intermediate (private) method to the
> call stack in unittest's 'assertEqual', which causes that test to fail.

That shouldn't be too difficult to fix; zope.testing already uses quite
a few regexp-based renormalizers to hide traceback elements that differ
in different Python versions.

(Debugging those is a pain, though.)

Marius Gedminas
-- 
http://pov.lt/ -- Zope 3 consulting and development

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

_______________________________________________
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )

Reply via email to