2011/3/25 Zope Tests Summarizer <zope-te...@epy.co.at>:
> Summary of messages to the zope-tests list.
> Period Thu Mar 24 12:00:00 2011 UTC to Fri Mar 25 12:00:00 2011 UTC.
> There were 48 messages: 8 from Zope Tests, 4 from buildbot at pov.lt, 23 from 
> buildbot at winbot.zope.org, 8 from ccomb at free.fr, 5 from jdriessen at 
> thehealthagency.com.
>
> Subject: FAILED : Zope 3.4 Known Good Set / py2.4-64bit-linux
> From: buildbot at pov.lt
> Date: Thu Mar 24 22:01:49 EDT 2011
> URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-March/036104.html
>
> Subject: FAILED : Zope 3.4 Known Good Set / py2.4-32bit-linux
> From: buildbot at pov.lt
> Date: Thu Mar 24 22:14:00 EDT 2011
> URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-March/036105.html
>
> Subject: FAILED : Zope 3.4 Known Good Set / py2.5-64bit-linux
> From: buildbot at pov.lt
> Date: Thu Mar 24 23:01:44 EDT 2011
> URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-March/036107.html
>
> Subject: FAILED : Zope 3.4 Known Good Set / py2.5-32bit-linux
> From: buildbot at pov.lt
> Date: Thu Mar 24 23:10:30 EDT 2011
> URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-March/036108.html
>
> Subject: FAILED : Zope 3.4 KGS / Python2.4.6 64bit linux
> From: ccomb at free.fr
> Date: Fri Mar 25 01:00:44 EDT 2011
> URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-March/036113.html
>
> Subject: FAILED : Zope 3.4 KGS / Python2.5.5 64bit linux
> From: ccomb at free.fr
> Date: Fri Mar 25 01:01:22 EDT 2011
> URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-March/036114.html

Zope 3.4 KGS builds failed because python-dateutil 2.0 was released,
that supports only Python 3. I have pinned python-dateutil = 0.1.5 in
zope.release that should fix all these failures.

Gediminas
_______________________________________________
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )

Reply via email to