On 5/10/11 5:38 AM, Lennart Regebro wrote:
> On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 09:15, Jens Vagelpohl<j...@dataflake.org>  wrote:
>> I strongly disagree on the term "Zope 2". Now is a great time to finally
>> stop the Zope2/3 confusion: Kill that name and start using a more
>> sensible name, such as "the Zope application server".

Right. However I'm not convinced this is something you can 
agree/disagree on. Zope 2 exists. Zope 3 does not (it was split apart 
and renamed). As such, I don't see a problem with referring to it (Zope 
2) by name (it's not Voldemort, after all). Someday it will die; but 
that day is not today. And until that day comes (or it gets renamed, 
heaven forbid) I would strive for clear and consistent branding (and in 
this case, I think I would also try to make it clear that Zope 2 is 
"legacy" software).

> Yup. That or just "Zope". That is what people mean when they say Zope anyway.

I don't think they know what they mean :-)



Alex Clark · http://aclark.net/training

Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )

Reply via email to