Hi, On 5/10/11 5:38 AM, Lennart Regebro wrote: > On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 09:15, Jens Vagelpohl<j...@dataflake.org> wrote: >> I strongly disagree on the term "Zope 2". Now is a great time to finally >> stop the Zope2/3 confusion: Kill that name and start using a more >> sensible name, such as "the Zope application server".
Right. However I'm not convinced this is something you can agree/disagree on. Zope 2 exists. Zope 3 does not (it was split apart and renamed). As such, I don't see a problem with referring to it (Zope 2) by name (it's not Voldemort, after all). Someday it will die; but that day is not today. And until that day comes (or it gets renamed, heaven forbid) I would strive for clear and consistent branding (and in this case, I think I would also try to make it clear that Zope 2 is "legacy" software). > > Yup. That or just "Zope". That is what people mean when they say Zope anyway. I don't think they know what they mean :-) Alex > -- Alex Clark · http://aclark.net/training _______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
