-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On 5/11/11 02:04 , Alex Clark wrote:
> On 5/10/11 5:38 AM, Lennart Regebro wrote:
>> On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 09:15, Jens Vagelpohl<j...@dataflake.org> wrote:
>>> I strongly disagree on the term "Zope 2". Now is a great time to finally
>>> stop the Zope2/3 confusion: Kill that name and start using a more
>>> sensible name, such as "the Zope application server".
> Right. However I'm not convinced this is something you can
> agree/disagree on. Zope 2 exists. Zope 3 does not (it was split apart
> and renamed). As such, I don't see a problem with referring to it (Zope
> 2) by name (it's not Voldemort, after all). Someday it will die; but
> that day is not today. And until that day comes (or it gets renamed,
> heaven forbid) I would strive for clear and consistent branding (and in
> this case, I think I would also try to make it clear that Zope 2 is
> "legacy" software).
Zope 2 was never a brand. It only existed to have a name for the older
application server when Zope 3 existed. It led to confusion and still
does. The name must go away. It is now the only application server with
the "Zope" name left, and that's a simple, clear and consistent brand.
We can help make the Zope 2 name go away by stopping its use on
"official" community sites like the new zope.org.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Darwin)
Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -