* 2011-06-12 22:49, Chris McDonough wrote:
> This seems slightly inconsistent with the adaptation worldview imposed by
> getAdapter/queryAdapter. I think it would be more consistent if
> "c.queryAdapter(IFoo, foo)" returned foo if foo already implemented IFoo
> and there was no other more specific adapter registered for the IFoo/foo
> pair in the registry, no?
+1, way more consistent than returning None.
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -