Hey, On 07/11/2011 06:09 PM, Andreas Jung wrote:
>> According to zope.org Gork is more like ZPT than it is >> like BlueBream. Griok is more like CMF than it is like BlueBream. This >> is because Grok is listed under the grab-bag framework category. > > I partly agree with you - I think Grok can be considered both as an > application server and as a framework. I would not object to move Grok > to the app server section if you want it. +1 > The problem is more that > grab-bag "framework". The "ZCA" is to be honest not a framework but a > concept and "ZPT" is a part of the "ZTK" and all other frameworks. Yeah, it's a grab bag item, I already mentioned that previously, but I still think Grok should be in the same category with BlueBream. We can look up my previous post to see what I suggested about the framework category there; I did offer some suggestions there. >> I also mention that 'Application Servers' may not be the best heading >> for the category which could contain Zope and BlueBream and Grok. Zope's >> an application server, the other two are called "web framework" > > I won't start a new philosophical discussion about differences between > application servers and web-frameworks - any better naming suggestion > for a category holding Zope, Bluebream and Grok? I'd just call the category "web framework"; 2 out of 3 already say they are. Zope can then itself say in its description that it's an application server if that's an important term. It's still a compromise but I think it's better to compromise towards "web framework" which is the more recognizable term. Regards, Martijn _______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )