On 11/16/2011 11:30 AM, Christian Theune wrote:
> I'd like to revert the removal of the ++skin++ traverser in Zope 4.
> As we're working on a replacement ZMI at a sprint currently (more
> details about that in a bit) we'd like to leverage this feature.
> From my perspective, I value that Zope 2/4 has always made some choices
> upfront that one could leverage right away. Especially as multiple
> orthogonal components (like: your application and the ZMI) need to
> leverage this plugin point, I'd rather have this provided by the framework.
> I couldn't find an argument anywhere why ++skin++ should be gone.
I'm interpreting the thread overall as an OK to revive the ++skin++
Christian Theune · c...@gocept.com
gocept gmbh & co. kg · forsterstraße 29 · 06112 halle (saale) · germany
http://gocept.com · tel +49 345 1229889 0 · fax +49 345 1229889 1
Zope and Plone consulting, development, hosting, operations
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -