On Apr 18, 2005, at 13:31, Zachery Bir wrote:
It's been a tricky business. For our part, we've been using PAS to separate the concerns of the folks using both the app server (traditional ZMI stuff) and folks using the application, and allow the application to talk directly to the plugins that concern it. We never bothered trying to come up with an API directly on PAS, since the plugins are so accessible.

Honestly, doing it that way leads to a complete mess as I'm finding out in the work I'm doing for Andrew. The goal of putting PAS into the application in question was, I assume, to make everything regarding user handling more generic so it's easier to factor out specific customer requirements. Unfortunately it's just the opposite, things are getting worse.


Zope-PAS mailing list

Reply via email to