> Sorry, Mark, and everyone else waiting for some pronouncement. No problem!
> Just got back from a week and a half in Honduras. Nice :) > I do want the > flexible ids, but I don't want PAS to care. Personally, I believe it > should be a configuration of the individual plugin, and where > present, the plugin will hand back mangled ids. That's how I was > planning on finishing the prefix implementation on my branch. Sounds good. It seems to me then that your branch is ready to go. As the plugins themselves will be responsible for this, we can simply declare that none of the supplied plugins are (currently) prefix-aware. The PAS public interface need not change to accomodate plugins that choose to implement this feature. When someone has a need for this, they must somehow manage to convert all their plugins to a "prefix-aware" implementation. Until then we can ignore it - which sounds fine to me! So I vote for merging your branch as it stands! All the tests seem to pass, and at least we have an agreed baseline from which to work. Once done I can then start nagging about http://www.zope.org/Members/urbanape/PluggableAuthService/Collector/7 <wink>. Cheers, Mark. _______________________________________________ Zope-PAS mailing list Zope-PAS@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-pas