Previously Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
> - - IMutablePropertiesPlugin.getPropertiesForUser deviates from the
> original contract in IPropertiesPlugin.getPropertiesForUser and
> returns a property sheet object instead of a mapping. IMHO it should
> return a mapping.
It has to return an object so it can persist property changes.
> - - IPropertiesPlugin.setPropertiesForUser claims to only accept a
> propertysheet object, but it would probably work fine with a simple
> mapping (eyeballing the implementation in the
> ZODBMutablePropertyProvider class). The contract could be changed to
> accept mappings.
Indeed, I'll update the contract to that effect.
> - - setting properties on a user will magically turn around and persist
> the change. This would be the first user folder I have seen where
> this happens. Personally, I'm a bit uncomfortable with this magic.
setProperty on GRUFUser will persist the change as well.
Wichert Akkerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> It is simple to make things.
http://www.wiggy.net/ It is hard to make things simple.
Zope-PAS mailing list