Previously Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
> After this somewhat muted discussion I think the best way forward
> would be to create a branch and merge whatever you think should be
> merged, and then we'll go from there deciding what gets merged back
> to the trunk. I'd think almost everything will, with the exception of
> that contentious magic persistence.
Sounds like an excellent plan. Who should I contact to get commit access
to work on that branch?
Wichert Akkerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> It is simple to make things.
http://www.wiggy.net/ It is hard to make things simple.
Zope-PAS mailing list