Previously Stefan H. Holek wrote:
> The main idea of my branch is to have all caching in PAS, so that
> individual plugins do not have to concern themselves with ZCacheable.
> I don't think it makes PAS more clumsy, it's just a few lines after
> all, but it makes auth plugins easier to write.
Having all caching complexity in a single location sounds a lot more
sensible than implementing caching in all plugins.
> On 19. Aug 2006, at 17:29, Tres Seaver wrote:
> >Can you hold off a bit? I'm travelling and would like to have time to
> >look at the patch more carefully. Overall, I *thin* I would like to
> >keep the caching itself out of the framework, because it is completely
> >irrelevant for lots of plugins, and introduces complexity / overhead.
> >An alternate idea I had was to implement a 'CacheablePluginHelper',
> >which would wrap another plugin, providing caching. It might be
> >possible to make it generic (like the ScriptablePlugin is).
> It doesn't necessarily do it in chronological order, though.
> --Douglas Adams
> Zope-PAS mailing list
Wichert Akkerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> It is simple to make things.
http://www.wiggy.net/ It is hard to make things simple.
Zope-PAS mailing list