On Friday 06 May 2005 12:11, Godefroid Chapelle wrote: > >> Stephan also have pointed that automatic translation doesn't allow > >> somebody to disable translation on purpose for some piece of content. > > > > Right. That's one reason why it's bad. > > Can someone explain this use case a bit deeper ? > > If this is a crucial use case, we could still better have > i18n:translate="nothing" or i18n:disable="" or i18n:omit-translate or > whatever on the specific places that needs to disable translation when > the python module author thought it should be translated.
Oh come on, this just sucks. I think Philipp raised numerous other good points I agree with, especially the comparison with Python code. Really, automatic translation violates the laws of explicitness. Regards, Stephan -- Stephan Richter CBU Physics & Chemistry (B.S.) / Tufts Physics (Ph.D. student) Web2k - Web Software Design, Development and Training _______________________________________________ Zope3-dev mailing list [email protected] Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
