> Interesting. It looks to me like you're calling a User object what the > CMF calls a Member.
Sure. Does the CMF have any users who aren't members? > Would you say that the existence of such a concept > in PAU should make principal annotation a unnecessary, if not even > deprecated? I don't really see the point of principal annotation as a special thing. Being able to annotate things is good. I'm not sure principals should be a special case either way. Can you annotate permissions? I don't think systems should be built relying on being able to annotate principals. That sounds kind of implicit. I'd rather see a first class User concept. -- Steve Alexander _______________________________________________ Zope3-dev mailing list Zope3-dev@zope.org Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
