> Interesting. It looks to me like you're calling a User object what the
> CMF calls a Member.
Sure. Does the CMF have any users who aren't members?
> Would you say that the existence of such a concept
> in PAU should make principal annotation a unnecessary, if not even
I don't really see the point of principal annotation as a special thing.
Being able to annotate things is good. I'm not sure principals should
be a special case either way. Can you annotate permissions?
I don't think systems should be built relying on being able to annotate
principals. That sounds kind of implicit. I'd rather see a first class
Zope3-dev mailing list