On Friday 04 November 2005 14:07, Adam Groszer wrote:
> I think (that may be stupid, because I'm not an expert) that the
> module is not 100% consistent, once it is checking on the passed
> folder's SiteManager (in ensureUtility) and then tries to add the
> utility to a maybe completely different SM (in addUtility).
> I propose a change to getSiteManagerDefault:
> def getSiteManagerDefault(root_folder):
> #default = zapi.traverse(folder.getSiteManager(), 'default')
> #package_name = '/++etc++site/default'
> #package = traverse(root_folder, package_name)
> package = traverse(root_folder.getSiteManager(), 'default')
> return package
> After that the module could be used even on sub-sites.
+1 for the change. Please write a test and check that in. If you cannot check
it in, put the fix and the test into the issue collector please.
CBU Physics & Chemistry (B.S.) / Tufts Physics (Ph.D. student)
Web2k - Web Software Design, Development and Training
Zope3-dev mailing list