-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Lennart Regebro wrote:
> I think this change can possibly make sense when we have replaced Zope
> 2 authentication with Zope 3s, and when we have replaces Zope 2
> publisher with Zope 3s and when we have replaced the Zope 2 traversal
> with Zope3s, and maybe a couple of other things.

Exactly. In this case Zope2 will be a more a 'configuration' of Zope3.
Well, I'm repeating my self here ...

> 
> At that point, Zope2 will more or less be Zope3 + App, DateTime, OFS,
> Products and some other stuff. Then something more of a merge might
> make sense.
> 

yup. This is my impression. This is too early...

> Up until then, we have a functioning system now, and I'm guessing the
> benefits will not outweigh the work.

I can only agree with this on this.

        J.

- --
Julien Anguenot | Nuxeo R&D (Paris, France)
CPS Platform : http://www.cps-project.org
Zope3 / ECM   : http://www.z3lab.org
mail: anguenot at nuxeo.com; tel: +33 (0) 6 72 57 57 66
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFDhbZWGhoG8MxZ/pIRAjA5AJ9NdWa0lfhoPrngxVK7CV6ttSPqpACeM9Pk
IXBQi5KCZotRxRoO+uJp/j0=
=mZRW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Zope3-dev mailing list
Zope3-dev@zope.org
Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to