Roger Ineichen wrote:
Hi Jim
[...]
Roger Ineichen wrote:
...
And please stop telling that there will be a migration path
for somthing.
Please stop saying that there won't be.
> I guess there will never be such a path.
I guess differently.
Ok, accepted
From now on I say, ask Jim ;-)
> Perhaps
custom products can be rewriten based on Zope3 libraries, but a real
migration path like known from other software will never be
supported.
Normaly Zope2 based projects are to highly customized and this will
make it impossible for a clear migration path. Perhaps this will be
different for standard use of a Plone or Silva. Butdo you
really know
somebody where is using Plone or Silva out of the box?
I'm convinced that there will be a migration path. I don't know if it
will be painless or automatic.
It may take the form of Zope 2's lower-level infrastructure
being replaced
by Zope 3's. I think this is entirely possible and would constitute a
real migration to Zope 3. It's very possible that there will be a
Zope 2 in the future that supports Zope 2 paradigms and Zope 3
paradigms simultaneously. This would look very different from many
"pure" Zope 3 applications, but perhaps no more different than a
number of sucessful Zope 3 applications such as Schooltool
and applications
being built by Canonical.
Yes, I know that this is possible. But are you really proposing
to start a project like this? Or do you mean Five is going or
should go in this direction?
It (or Zope 2 development in general, which is becoming indistinguishable
from Five) is going in this direction.
Jim
--
Jim Fulton mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Python Powered!
CTO (540) 361-1714 http://www.python.org
Zope Corporation http://www.zope.com http://www.zope.org
_______________________________________________
Zope3-dev mailing list
[email protected]
Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
