Christian Theune wrote:
Am Donnerstag, den 12.01.2006, 12:52 -0500 schrieb Jim Fulton:
Is this intentional?
Yes. self is never proxied.
Ok. Just for my understanding: This results in a behaviour similar to
Java where you can access everything within your own class, regardless
of private/public declarations. (It's not the same thing, but has
similarities.)
> I'm not sure about that. I feel like those calls
should work with proxied objects as well.
I don't agree. At some point, you have to trust code,
especially methods.
Is there a distinct border that makes it behave that way when you leave
view code and switch to (content) components?
I don't understand the question.
It behaves that way because self is inside the proxy and we
don't rebind methods when we access them.
[patch by me pointing out differences between C-optimized proxy code
and the python version
Good point.
So which one would be the correct one? Should there be a unit test
catching this?
The C version is the "correct" one. Because the security policy
has this check, the C version is mostly an optimization.
Jim
--
Jim Fulton mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Python Powered!
CTO (540) 361-1714 http://www.python.org
Zope Corporation http://www.zope.com http://www.zope.org
_______________________________________________
Zope3-dev mailing list
Zope3-dev@zope.org
Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
