Chris Withers wrote: > (and if we can get it down to one, we don't have to specify it at the > top of the file... yay!)
Not really. Specifying no namespace at all is not the same as specifying the namespace of prefix-less elements. Even with one namespace the declaration of that namespace is still useful from a semantic point of view, e.g. when mixing ZCML with other XML. For example, I could imagine to inline-document ZCML with additional DocBook tags. It's currenty not possible because the ZCML machinery expects every element to be a directive or subdirective. When all ZCML directives are part of a single namespace, though, other namespaces are free to be used for documentation, XInclude, etc. For that to work, though, the ZCML namespace should be defined explicitly, even if it's only one, to distinguish it explicitly from other stuff. Philipp ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program. _______________________________________________ Zope3-dev mailing list [email protected] Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
