Martijn Faassen wrote at 2006-1-27 13:21 +0100:
>Five actually adds a 'five' namespace, which I think is very useful --
>it clearly marks which directives are only there for Zope 2 and thus you
>cannot expect them to work in Zope 3. Not having namespaces would make
>this a lot harder to mark, and the temptation would exist to mangle
>namespaces into the names by using prefixes and the like.
I think that is the major complaint: the need to associate
an easy to remember and (in a restricted context) completely
sufficient prefix (like "five:") with a horrible URN, you always
have to look up.
Zope3-dev mailing list