Stephan Richter wrote: >>Jim said that he wants zope.app to become smaller. I would welcome that. >>Is it time for this to be thought about? >> >>For various reasons, mostly personal ones, I would consider Zope >>3.3/2.10 a good point for this to be done. If others agree, we should >>get started, especially since we moved up the time frame 1 month. > > I would not mind. I think most of the work will be investigating and > documenting the steps to be taken. Technically it is less of a challenge.
I agree. I would be willing to do some of that investigation, though I bet Jim will have his share of thoughts as well... > On the other hand, this release will see a lot of shake-up: ZCML > directive removal, adapter registry reimplementation, package > location changes. Yes, that's true. But then again, it's better now than in 6 months when perhaps half of the vital Zope 2 projects are actively using Zope 3 software (CPS and Silva already are, Plone will be by then). I also think that the release system we have chosen shouldn't stand in the way of agile refactorings. If the last release contained only 10 new features, I have no problem when the next one contains 100 or 1000, given it's all properly documented and BBB is provided. We wanted time-based releases, that's what we have, not feature-driven ones. Philipp _______________________________________________ Zope3-dev mailing list Zope3firstname.lastname@example.org Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com