Martijn Faassen wrote:
So, my proposal would be to tone down the vision to what we have
already: a co-evolving Zope 3 and Zope 2, with Zope 2 following and Zope
3 leading (or Zope 2 driving Zope 3 forward, however you want to see
it). No renaming necessary. No change of course necessary. Zope 2 can
stick to Zope 2 features as long as necessary so there's no rush to
replicate Zope 2 functionality in Zope 3 any time soon. At the same
time, Zope 2 requirements can drive the evolution of Zope 3.
An emphatic +1.
Senior Software Engineer
Zope3-dev mailing list