On Tuesday 28 February 2006 11:28, Paul Winkler wrote:
> Haven't we said forever that we want parts of zope 3 to be easily usable
> independently of each other? Is there anything controversial about
> making that more convenient?
My post is not about the merit of the change, but about neglecting the process
that *we all* decided to use. I was against always requiring proposals, other
voted for it. Now that we have it we have to use it. Sprints have a tendency
to hastily make decisions; I certainly did my part as well. Sprints should be
either used to brainstorm and write proposals or implement existing ones. We
cannot just neglect our own process, otherwise its worth nothing.
CBU Physics & Chemistry (B.S.) / Tufts Physics (Ph.D. student)
Web2k - Web Software Design, Development and Training
Zope3-dev mailing list