Chris McDonough wrote:
> 
> My $.02:  I suspect it might be better to just use XML than  
> configparser as a ZConfig replacement.  The config format is a  
> stretch under CP due to the lack of hierarchy.  I'm beginning to  
> think the "don't make admins use XML" argument should die.  Everybody  
> knows how to edit XML nowadays, and if you need hierarchy, its  
> familiarity is tough to argue with.
> 
> - C
> 

Yes, can we all agree to stop responding to RoR's FUD about XML situps. They
make very simple products (by design) which is great. Now ask them when all
their very simple products are going to interoperate!? Hmmm.. I wouldn't
want to be on that refactor *cough* (rewrite) team.

Kevin Smith
--
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/RFC%3A-Use-ConfigParser-for-High-Level-Configuration-t1226924.html#a3284880
Sent from the Zope3 - dev forum at Nabble.com.

_______________________________________________
Zope3-dev mailing list
Zope3-dev@zope.org
Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to