> ZCML as of Zope 3.2 is inconsistent and to someone who's new
> and doesn't know every little detail from behind the scenes
> it's very obscure. And then it also makes debugging hard
> which has bitten me personally quite a few times. I explained
> this is a reply to Rocky Burt in this thread:
I don't telling that you are not right at all ;-)
It's just not correct to remove the old way of doing.
> Now, would you rather make an attempt to document the
> inconsistent (and hard to maintain, not to forget!), or
> wouldn't you rather make an attempt at fixing the damn thing?
I guess, making the refactoring and support a high level
directive doing the old way will solve the problem.
Zope3-dev mailing list