Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
Christian Theune wrote:
Log message for revision 69387:
- Removed conflicting security declaration for the traversal adapter that
returns a Session object.
2006-08-10 08:24:12 UTC (rev 69386)
2006-08-10 12:23:22 UTC (rev 69387)
@@ -23,7 +23,6 @@
Hah! I can't believe that was the problem. It all makes sense now. I
still wonder why the session object was still wrapped in a proxy whose
checker didn't allow anything... seems that such a setup causes the
security machinery to be a little confused? Perhaps the system shouldn't
allow such combinations (adapter security + security of the class)?
I agree. This combination should raise a ConflictError IMHO.
The technical problem was that a generated factory method was generated
twice, the second time with the wrong checker attached.
gocept gmbh & co. kg - forsterstraße 29 - 06112 halle/saale - germany
www.gocept.com - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - phone +49 345 122 9889 7 -
fax +49 345 122 9889 1 - zope and plone consulting and development
Zope3-dev mailing list